Science and abortion

Since it is legal to use fetal tissue.  Aka aborted body parts. Is the purity of the scientific method being adhered too?

Are we expected to believe science is taking what they can get?
We live in a time where a woman carry in her womb a child that is not genetically hers.

Are scientists using fetal tissue without knowing the genetics of the tissue?  Is this an added layer in their research?  Since we are expected to believe this tissue is coming from a waste bucket. We are expected to believe lab techs are sifting through looking for tissue that has begun to develop.

It would seem like an obvious benefit to have access to tissue that is further along in the development process. If the rape incest reason for abortion is the majority of available fetal tissue, that adds another layer of research. Trying to determine paternity and genetics of the fetal tissue.  However it would seem more efficient to use egg bank/sperm bank donations to create a fetus that would later be aborted. The genetics would be established. I'm not sure how scientifically valuable incest tissue is.

I can see science wanting to work with tissue from people who had an established paternity. Specific hereditary or chronic conditions.  To unlock mysteries of disease, and win the Nobel Prize.

I wonder if the conversation will ever get into any of these dark places. There is nothing preventing the public from knowing what science is doing with fetal tissue.  Why isn't it being talked about?

Is there shame in the scientific community because they know they are purposefully harvesting fetal tissue?

Is the religious community preventing the conversation?

What has happened in the case of David Daleiden he successfully exposed the scientific community.  The law is fully on the side of scientific use of fetal tissue. Why aren't the researchers wanting to speak candidly about their research to the general public?